How many of my readers...
Jul. 31st, 2007 12:50 pmHow many of my readers are forbidden from discussing their wage rates?
A recent supreme court decision ruled against a woman who filed suit against Goodyear because she didn't file within 180 days of violation of equal wage laws.
The kicker? She didn't find out she was being paid less than her male co-workers for years after the fact because Goodyear doesn't allow workers to discuss their rates of pay.
I've always resented being silenced about what I make because of this very reason. Pay discrimination is real, and when employers forbid wage earners from discussing their pay, it's a form of control that prevents detection.
Recently, a bill was passed in the House of Representatives called "Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2007," and it looks like it will pass the Senate, too.
Bush has stated he will veto it.
A recent supreme court decision ruled against a woman who filed suit against Goodyear because she didn't file within 180 days of violation of equal wage laws.
The kicker? She didn't find out she was being paid less than her male co-workers for years after the fact because Goodyear doesn't allow workers to discuss their rates of pay.
I've always resented being silenced about what I make because of this very reason. Pay discrimination is real, and when employers forbid wage earners from discussing their pay, it's a form of control that prevents detection.
Recently, a bill was passed in the House of Representatives called "Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2007," and it looks like it will pass the Senate, too.
Bush has stated he will veto it.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-31 07:57 pm (UTC)But now that you put it that way... it could be an issue. But then again most of the places I have worked have been mostly male except for the owners who happened to be female (go figure).
no subject
Date: 2007-07-31 08:15 pm (UTC)Bush is going to veto anything which could even remotely take money away from his precious. Note how he attempted to kill PBS' funding recently.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-01 01:27 am (UTC)In California, it's illegal for an employer to tell employees they can't discuss their wages.
232. No employer may do any of the following:
(a) Require, as a condition of employment, that an employee
refrain from disclosing the amount of his or her wages.
(b) Require an employee to sign a waiver or other document that
purports to deny the employee the right to disclose the amount of his
or her wages.
(c) Discharge, formally discipline, or otherwise discriminate
against an employee who discloses the amount of his or her wages.
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=lab&group=00001-01000&file=200-243
Which I think is just awesome.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-01 01:52 am (UTC)I had no clue California had that law!
Welcome, BTW. Thanks for commenting.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-01 02:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-01 02:07 am (UTC)Whenever I've discussed pay rates with fellow workers in the past I've been horrified about the inequities. I want to avoid that.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-01 04:04 am (UTC)The sad fact is, humans are vain creatures. Like it or not, a rate of pay is often interpreted as a statement of your value to the company, rather than as compensation for a skill set or longevity with the company. And very often, employees who find out that someone they consider to be inferior makes more money than they do leads to resentment, conflict and employee turnover when the "slighted" employee leaves because the feel they are being treated unfairly. In an effort to avoid this, the normal reaction of a company is to give the "complaining" employee a raise, which sets a bad precedent that puts the employee in control of wages and raises.
So yes, at my company, we have a policy that prohibits the discussing of wages.