Terri Shiavo has died.
Mar. 31st, 2005 10:45 amTerri Shiavo has died.
She's well away from the media circus, the political grandstanding, the debate in this country over end-of-life matters that in my opinion should remain in the hands of the citizens and not congress.
What it boils down to is this: my opinions on whether or not she was a vegetable, or brain dead, or simply disabled don't matter. What matters is her husband's decision. We can question his motives, and if there is evidence, try him for attempted murder.
However, numerous courts have investigated him, and found nothing.
What I fear now is a backlash in congress. I fear that *my* end-of-life wishes will be negated by strangers in Washington, that I will be kept alive against my will.
I do not wish to live like Terri did, oblivious to the world around her, locked in a body that was of no use to her.
There are some who say otherwise. There are folks who feel that a persistent vegetative state is not a living hell, but believe that they will find new worlds within their own mind.
I know the worlds in my mind from dreams. I don't want to live there.
As long as I have some connection with those I love, if I can communicate by blinking my eyes, let me live. But don't hold me here in a useless body if I'm a vegetable.
She's well away from the media circus, the political grandstanding, the debate in this country over end-of-life matters that in my opinion should remain in the hands of the citizens and not congress.
What it boils down to is this: my opinions on whether or not she was a vegetable, or brain dead, or simply disabled don't matter. What matters is her husband's decision. We can question his motives, and if there is evidence, try him for attempted murder.
However, numerous courts have investigated him, and found nothing.
What I fear now is a backlash in congress. I fear that *my* end-of-life wishes will be negated by strangers in Washington, that I will be kept alive against my will.
I do not wish to live like Terri did, oblivious to the world around her, locked in a body that was of no use to her.
There are some who say otherwise. There are folks who feel that a persistent vegetative state is not a living hell, but believe that they will find new worlds within their own mind.
I know the worlds in my mind from dreams. I don't want to live there.
As long as I have some connection with those I love, if I can communicate by blinking my eyes, let me live. But don't hold me here in a useless body if I'm a vegetable.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-31 04:02 pm (UTC)I love you with all of my heart and I will respect your wishes to the last. If for some reason you should haveto make a decision for me, I would also like the same. I don't want to live a partial existance aided by machines or feeding tubes. If there isn't a large chance of success for my revival, then pull the plug on me.
That being said, what I don't understand is why don't more people sign Do Not Resucitate(Sp?) forms. That would solve all of our problems and the government wouldn't be able to touch that. It's a legally binding contract and it cannot be overruled by anybody, including congress. We are gravitating closer and closer to George Orwell's 1984. The government already wants to try to make laws to control women's bodies over the debate of abortion. And don't get me started on the religious overtones many of these congressmen are using as a transparent shield. Seperation of church and state my fat white hairy ass!
no subject
Date: 2005-03-31 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-31 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-31 05:52 pm (UTC)False, I'm sorry to say. Congress can declare actions illegal, including the withdrawal of artificial life support, if it so chooses. Should it do so, your legally binding contract is worth as much as the toilet paper in the stall down the hall (though the contract is probably softer).
no subject
Date: 2005-03-31 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-31 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-03-31 11:06 pm (UTC)At least now the poor man (presumably in his forties) can now get on with his life. I've heard nothing about his plight but his life can not have been an easy one. There will more dramas to come, no doubt, due to his notoriety. I'd move house, personally.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-31 11:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-01 03:14 am (UTC)What I find particularly poignant about it all is that although Michael Schiavo had the right as legal guardian to decide on his own that his wife should have her feeding tube removed, everything I've read about the case suggests that he didn't - he went to the courts with the available evidence and petitioned them to decide whether she should have the tube removed. Admittedly he took the position that Terri be allowed to die, while her parents opposed it, but he didn't make the decision autonomously. To be branded a money-hungry murderer for deciding to discontinue life-support would be horrific at any time, but to be blamed for the decision when you didn't actually make it, but deferred to the authorities deemed appropriate in the circumstance, is particularly awful.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-01 11:08 am (UTC)I can't help appreciating the irony (very black irony) that the whole debacle was over force-feeding a woman who if she'd fed herself when she could, would never have been in this situation.
I like to think that in this country we're not quite as hung up on the pursuit of physical beauty, but as one who used to have anorexia/bulimia, who am I to speak?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-02 12:27 am (UTC)