"Tort Reform"

[ambitious_wench]

I love Wikipedia. It's probably the most balanced source of information I've found on the web.

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tort_reform
Comment: Brief, esay to understand article taken whole-cloth from Wikipedia. Isn't learning great?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Tort reform is a term used by supporters of a heavily disputed claim that the American court system has too many frivolous civil lawsuits. In a frivolous lawsuit, either there is no link between the conduct of the defendant and the injuries sustained by the plaintiff or the damages awarded to the injured plaintiff are perceived to be too high for the injuries sustained. Most reforms are aimed at placing caps on actual and punitive damages, enacting restrictions on the lawsuits filed, and otherwise limiting the consumers' compensation in the courts. Advocates claim that by limiting the amounts consumers can receive, costs of doing business can be significantly decreased, especially in the case of medical malpractice insurance. In this particular argument, medical costs would decrease, making it more affordable for everyone. Detractors claim that the real intent is to shield businesses, primarily insurance companies, from having to pay just damages for legitimate claims, while sacrificing consumers' rights. They argue that large punitive judgements are the only way for the cost-benefit analysis to discourage polluting, dangerous product malfunctions, and the like.


Tort reform is controversial and has become a major rift between the Republicans and Democrats. Most notably, in the 2004 presidential election, vice presidential nominee John Edwards, a successful plantiff's lawyer, has been heavily criticized by tort reform advocates.


The proposals advanced as "tort reform" generally do not address the issues of frivolous suits brought by businesses against competitors or against government regulation, nor do they include frivolous defenses raised in consumer actions.